Takei Slams Trump’s ‘Weaponization’ of DOJ
The Star Trek icon warns that an Orwellian order masks a scheme to politicize the courts.
Poulami is an associate editor. She did her MA in English from Miranda House, University of Delhi and has qualified UGC-NET. She also holds a PG diploma in Editing and Publishing from Jadavpur University. Her journey as a content writer began in 2017 and since then, Poulami has garnered diverse interests along the way.
Read full bio of Poulami Nag
Image: Instagram
George Takei is once again using his sizable social media platform to call out what he sees as executive overreach. In a recent Instagram post, the Star Trek actor and activist shared a photo of Representative LaMonica McIver, crediting the congresswoman for speaking out against President Trump’s day-one executive order. “The Trump administration claims to be ‘ending the weaponization of government,’ but behind Trump’s Orwellian day-one executive order is a blueprint for turning the DOJ into his personal political weapon,” Takei wrote. “We’ve already seen it used against judges who defy Trump’s anti-immigrant agenda, and now, it’s being aimed at a sitting member of Congress.”
Doj Independence At Risk
Critics say the January 20 order, titled “Promoting Public Safety and Sovereignty,” allows the Attorney General to appoint presidentially loyal overseers in every U.S. Attorney’s office. According to reporting by The Washington Post, those “principal advisors” can now review and potentially veto career prosecutors’ decisions on high-profile cases. Legal experts warn this undercuts longstanding DOJ norms designed to shield criminal indictments from political influence.
A New York Times analysis points to two recent incidents as evidence of the order’s impact. First, defense motions in an immigration-related civil case were blocked after a Trump appointee determined they might conflict with the administration’s hard-line border policies. More recently, the DOJ opened a preliminary inquiry into a progressive congresswoman’s remarks—an investigation one former Justice official says wouldn’t have been possible under previous guidelines.
Takei’s Social Media Activism
This is far from Takei’s first critique. In March, he posted a related commentary on the administration’s treatment of migrants. “‘The cruelty is the point,’ or so we’re often told about the Trump administration. But history shows us that cruelty isn’t just about sadism. It’s a tactic to advance a broader agenda,” he wrote.
Instagram embed: https://www.instagram.com/p/DJ40GO1vR-J/
That post, shared under the handle @georgehtakei, underscored how policy and public messaging can work in tandem to shift public perception. Takei has repeatedly used brief but pointed captions—“No lie detected,” “Deplorable as always,” and “The incompetence is off the charts”—to draw attention and drive followers to in-depth analyses via linked articles.
A History Of Political Pressure
The Justice Department’s independence has waxed and waned over administrations. Under Presidents Reagan and Clinton, guidelines enforced a firewall between political appointees and career prosecutors. However, experts note that during the Bush administration, a series of firings of U.S. Attorneys sparked a 2007 congressional inquiry into partisan interference in DOJ operations.
The current debate centers on whether the new executive order simply updates internal oversight mechanisms or if it represents a fundamental shift toward placing prosecutorial power directly under the White House’s thumb. In congressional hearings last month, House Judiciary members questioned Attorney General William Barr about whether he had authority to override charges brought by career lawyers—a line of inquiry that Barr deflected, citing confidentiality rules.
Takei’s post builds on these developments by warning followers that the latest moves could chill judges who rule against the administration’s policy priorities. Representative McIver, whose image accompanied Takei’s caption, introduced a resolution this spring condemning any attempt to punish judicial officers for upholding the law.
As the debate unfolds, Takei’s call to action is clear: stay informed and demand accountability. By spotlighting the intersection of celebrity influence and civic engagement, he hopes to galvanize a broader audience into monitoring DOJ actions that were once considered off-limits for political direction.
Whether you follow him for fandom or for advocacy, the message is consistent: when the justice system itself becomes a battlefield for partisan goals, every citizen has a stake in preserving its neutrality. That, Takei suggests, is the real fight behind the rhetoric.
Read full bio of Poulami Nag
