Competing Standards Fuel Art Student Burnout

Michael Prince, the acclaimed violinist widely recognized on Instagram as @michaelprinceviolin, has sparked conversation with a candid reflection on the competitive nature of art programs. In his recent post, he stated:

“All Region. All State. Area. Young Arts. All just methods to rank us and put us against each other. Nowadays, I’m realizing that that actually gets you nowhere but burnt out. Always competing, always wanting to have the most gigs, etc. The percentage of students that pursue art post high school dwindles when the art is only validated if it meets the “state’s standards”.”

This statement has resonated with many fans and fellow artists who question whether the very system designed to recognize talent may inadvertently be stifling creative growth. Michael’s reflections come amid ongoing debates in the creative community over the pressure to conform to standardized measures of success.

Challenging The Traditional Metrics

For decades, art competitions and state-sanctioned awards have been seen as benchmarks for talent. However, Prince argues that these metrics often pit emerging artists against each other in unhealthy ways. Rather than nurturing innovation, this constant comparison can lead to burnout. Young artists, he notes, may ultimately abandon their creative pursuits if they feel their work is only valuable when it conforms to predefined standards.

The violinist’s commentary sheds light on a broader issue within arts education. Many educators and industry professionals have observed a significant drop in students pursuing advanced studies in the arts following high school. The pressure to meet state standards means that creative expression is sometimes reduced to a series of quantifiable outcomes. With fewer students willing to take this risk, the arts may face a long-term talent shortage despite the high level of passion and skill present at the grassroots level.

Balancing Competition With Creative Freedom

Michael Prince’s perspective is particularly compelling given his own career, which spans not only live performance but also collaborations and promotional events. An earlier Instagram post reflected his diverse engagements: he was once featured alongside vibrant events such as a poetry night in New Orleans and dynamic studio sessions heralded by fellow musicians and poets. These past events illustrate a commitment to fostering a creative community that values expression over rigid competition.

Prince’s comments come at a time when many in the art and music scenes are rethinking how talent is nurtured. In environments ranging from classical music to modern experimental art, the conversation has shifted toward creating supportive spaces that celebrate originality. Instead of a constant tally of wins and losses, there is growing advocacy for mentorship programs, community showcases, and informal gatherings where emerging talents can thrive without the burden of formal validation.

The violinist’s post, with its succinct yet powerful message, also touches on the personal toll that the competitive climate can exact. Continuous competition, he suggests, does not build resilience—it burns out potential. When every performance or portfolio is measured strictly by external standards, the spirit of artistic exploration may be compromised. His observations serve as a wake-up call not only for educational policymakers but also for industry veterans responsible for shaping the next generation of creatives.

In several accompanying Instagram images, Prince is seen engaging with his audience both on and off stage. One image from his current post shows him in a relaxed yet thoughtful pose, seemingly contemplating these industry-wide challenges. The rawness of the image—paired with his reflective caption—underscores a genuine desire to foster a more holistic understanding of art, one that moves beyond the binary of success and failure.

These sentiments are echoed in Michael’s earlier social media activities. Past posts have highlighted exciting upcoming events and collaborations, including performances at renowned venues and spontaneous jam sessions that embraced a more playful, unstructured approach to music. Such moments have nurtured a growing community that values experimentation and creative risk-taking. By sharing his personal experience and observations on the pitfalls of competitive validation, Michael is championing a recalibration of how artistic achievement is defined.

While the debate over standardization in the arts is not new, voices like Michael Prince’s add tangible weight to the argument for change. His call to rethink the metrics by which artistic talent is judged resonates with educators, students, and established performers alike. It is a plea for the industry to create environments where creativity can flourish free from the shackles of relentless, and at times counterproductive, competition.

Michael Prince’s reflection is an invitation for all stakeholders in the arts to consider a more balanced approach—one that values innovation, emotional expression, and the joy of creation over narrow definitions of success. As the conversation continues to evolve, his insight may well serve as a catalyst for transformative changes in the way talent is recognized and nurtured.

In sharing his honest opinion, Michael Prince has not only challenged the status quo but also opened up an important discussion. It remains to be seen how the arts community will respond, but one thing is clear: the call to redefine success in the creative world is stronger than ever.

Reporter

Ratika Pai

 

Ratika holds a master's degree in commerce and a post-graduate diploma in communication and journalism from Mumbai University. She has 6 years of experience writing in various fields, such as finance, education, and lifestyle.

Read full bio of Ratika Pai